This is the sort of thing that I would have tried using DxO ViewPoint to correct after creating the pano but it seems that PTGui has already done it.Īlso, given the relatively large part of the final picture occupied by the people who are close to camera, it was not necessarily a bad thing to raise the ISO and increase shutter speed to reduce subject motion. Aside from differences in the masking and joining of images, the Autopano image has left the closer people with wider-looking heads. In those two pictures it seems that the two programs have done different corrections of volumetric deformation. ![]() Same files with ptgui, bit more distorted for some reason so I'm still trying to figure it out why. Lady in bottom left turned her head, masking saved me. Last week at the ESPN Wide World of Sports in Orlando, Worlds Cheer competition. I rarely use a tripod although I would going beyond 200mm.Īutopano, 14 images, 1dx, 24-70ii, iso 12800, 1/1000, duh wasn't paying attention Quality of images will play a huge role and overlap with either. I'm somewhat a novice with ptgui it's not too difficult to figure out it's quirks, while I'ved used autopano used for 2+ years. Someone is going to say microsoft ICE, I think it has some creative functions but no where near the stitching features of autopano or ptgui. Both have features to controlling exposure, blending, the one thing I've learned is never crop images or level images prior to importing for better stitching. The autopano interface is much more refined, ptgui is just littered with windows and a bit clumsy. Cropping on ptgui is stupid, autopano wins here with easily selecting the image and setting rotation values. Masking is tough to compare, anything with moving images like people in a crowd will be a challenge. Masking could go both ways, ptgui uses a paint method vs autopano is a little vague with just stamping points on various areas. Autopano also calculates the quality of stitch points and you delete as necessary to imporve stitching. Matching up specific points or comparing a selected area between images is very powerful with autopano, ptgui as far as I could figure is point by point. The control points editing are by far superior to control between images than ptgui. I think Autopano is easier to use and produces a better image imo. So given my situation, do you guys recommend one option over the other? What are their relative pro’s and con's? However, I am thinking of doing more gigapixel images with a telephoto lens (I already got a pano head specifically for this). ![]() ![]() ![]() Never any of those 360*180 degree virtual reality shots. I tried both with some simple panorama and they both seem to work relatively well. I’m currently trying to decide between getting Autopano Giga and PTGui for my panoramas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |